cooperation in BRics and the eu paradox Paulo borba casella Chair Professor for public International law Vice-Dean at the University of sao Paulo Law school Visiting Professor at the University of Macau Law School (since 2007)& author of BRIC(2011
cooperation in BRICS and the EU paradox Paulo Borba CASELLA Chair Professor for Public International Law & Vice-Dean at the University of São Paulo Law School; Visiting Professor at the University of Macau Law School (since 2007) & author of BRIC (2011)
cooperation in brics why? Brazil. russia. India. China south africa cooperation has its usual role in today' s world: as known and extensively practiced already interdependence of countries in present world makes cooperation a requirement in each countr can cooperation have added value? can the brics build a new model useful for the world?
cooperation in BRICS - why? Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa - cooperation has its usual role in today’s world: as known and extensively practiced already - interdependence of countries in present world makes cooperation a requirement in each country - can cooperation have added value? - can the BRICS build a new model, useful for the world?
e European Union paradoX the present status of eu between an igo and a confederation of states -no parallel in admirable achievements over decades fully developed institutional legal system including constitutional principles substantive law and procedures for quality control of integration development
the European Union paradox • the present status of EU between an IGO and a confederation of states – no parallel in history • admirable achievements over decades • fully developed institutional & legal system, including ‘constitutional’ principles, substantive law and procedures for quality control of integration development
whereas the brics not even one treaty to stipulate what are the rights and the obligations of participant countries all we have are the three declarations. closing the year summits of Brasilia, Ekaterinburg and Sanya all remains to be done but not forget changes of international perception of these and by each of these countries along latest years the will attached to achieve added value could be the role of international law relations shaping a new multilateral world order
whereas the BRICS ... • not even one treaty to stipulate what are the rights and the obligations of participant countries • all we have are the three declarations, closing the year summits of Brasilia, Ekaterimburg and Sanya • all remains to be done, but not forget changes of international perception of these and by each of these countries along latest years • the will attached to achieve added value: could be the role of international law & relations shaping a new multilateral world order
as we know there are no short cuts need to understand each of these civilizations quite complex and apparently very different each of same to be considered in their respective history, culture, economy, international relations the attitude towards international law, and politics both internal international thereafter can joint views be attempted played BRIC is Showing something new on the scene
as we know, there are no short cuts - need to understand each of these civilizations, quite complex and apparently very different - each of same to be considered in their respective history, culture, economy, international relations - the attitude towards international law, and politics, both internal & international - thereafter can joint views be attempted & played - BRIC is showing something new on the scene